http://zelda-queen.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] zelda-queen.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] zelda_queen 2012-06-28 04:38 am (UTC)

"If you compare that to Nora and Patch here, you see Patch is completely unchanged. He, like Edward, is considered 'perfect' as is, so why change him? Despite the fact that the bad boy appeal comes COMPLETELY with change. You want a bad boy so you can change him. By having Patch remain the exact same, he isn't given the most important part of the bad boy, the redemption. Even though that is the most GENERIC change you can have your heroine bestow on the hero."

The bizarre thing is, Fitzpatrick seems to think that he DID change. She said in an interview how he "softened", and Nora comments in an "extra" story written how Patch has become calmer and sweeter after the events of book 1, but most people just weren't paying attention enough to notice it.

Yes, I realize that this makes no sense.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting